[discuss] ITU - Internet related Resolutions

Mon Oct 27 11:31:23 UTC 2014

FYI, the Indian proposal:
http://files.wcitleaks.org/public/S14-PP-C-0098!!MSW-E.pdf

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org>
wrote:

> Good afternoon
>
> There are many fine people out here with great experience; but the help of
> all through lobbying and information is most welcome. The Indian proposal
> may be discussed tomorrow / Wednesday.
>
> Best
>
> Nigel
>
> On 27/10/14 20:16, "Nick Thorne" <nick.thorne at domzac.org> wrote:
>
> >Nigel
> >Could you please send me the "Indian Proposal"?
> >If it is clearly unhelpful I'll try to generate some more positive input.
> >Respect to all those fighting the good fight.
> >Nick
> >Nick.Thorne
> >nick.thorne at domzac.org
> >+33687365517
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On 27 Oct 2014, at 03:32, Nigel Hickson <nigel.hickson at icann.org> wrote:
> >
> >Paul and colleagues
> >
> >The second Ad Hoc in Internet Resolutions (101/102/133/180) will be at
> >18.30 tonight; will also be where proposals for new Resolutions will be
> >presented including the Indian proposal. On Saturday we had initial read
> >through of half of Res 101 and all of Res 133.
> >
> >Best
> >
> >Nigel
> >
> >
> >On 27/10/14 11:27, "Paul Wilson" <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Bill.
> >>
> >> was there any webcast or transcript kept for this session?   i guess
> >> maybe not since it was an ³ad hoc².
> >>
> >> but some insights into the specific issues and discussions would be very
> >> useful.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 27 Oct 2014, at 11:30 am, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Adam <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> A document combining various Internet related resolutions being
> >>>> considered at the ITU Plenipotentiary is available on WCITLeaks.org.
> >>>> These working docs not available through the ITU's website, seem to
> >>>> require ties account.
> >>>>
> >>>> Internet related
> >>>> <http://files.wcitleaks.org/public/S14-PP-141020-DL-0011!!MSW-E.pdf>
> >>>
> >>> We got through a good bit of this on Saturday afternoon, though with
> >>> little to no substantive outcome, because of irreconcilable differences
> >>> between Saudi Arabia and the OECD countries.  Debate continues this
> >>> (Monday) evening.
> >>>
> >>>                               -Bill
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> discuss mailing list
> >>> discuss at 1net.org
> >>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> discuss mailing list
> >> discuss at 1net.org
> >> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >_______________________________________________
> >discuss mailing list
> >discuss at 1net.org
> >http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20141027/df12fba4/attachment.html>