[discuss] ITU - Internet related Resolutions
Carlos Raúl G.
crg at isoc-cr.org
Mon Oct 27 13:50:57 UTC 2014
I ask myself the same question: how different for Governments is the ITU forum from other Fora where they seems perfectly happy with the bottom up MS model?
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8335 2487
Enviado desde mi iPhone
> El 27/10/2014, a las 7:33, Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn at gmail.com> escribió:
> I am curious to know why Brazil is on the side of Russia, despite embracing the multi-stakeholder model, demonstrated recently by Dilma Roussef's support for NetMundial and despite the proven success of nic.br's multi-stakeholder model, despite the benevolent influence of Brazilian Community Leaders like Harmut Glaser. What caused Brazil to be part of IBSA and why is it on the wrong side?
> Sivasubramanian M
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:
>> > On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Adam <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
>> > Is Saudi speaking for a large block of countries?
>> In so far as lines are drawn, here’s what I’ve observed this evening:
>> On one side:
>> The Internets
>> United Kingdom
>> New Zealand
>> On the other side:
>> Saudi Arabia
>> Helpful grammar authoritarians, who are striving to make evil documents at least marginally intelligible:
>> Meeting concluded with an admonishment by the chair to Saudi Arabia to consider limiting its contributions to ones which “reflect present reality.”
>> The Internet-issues ad-hoc reconvenes at 18:00 on Wednesday, unless the secretariat is able to find an earlier time.
>> Fact-checking the idiocy that’s spouted in this room is surprisingly difficult, given 85% packet loss getting out of the building. One could be cynical about that, but I’ll resist the urge.
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at 1net.org
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss