<html>
<body>
At 15:21 21/02/2014, John Curran wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">On Feb 21, 2014, at 8:45 AM,
Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com> wrote:<br>
> W3C is a member of OpenStand. ICANN joined in Montevideo where the
IEEE was not present. This created an unbalance:<br><br>
ICANN joined _what_ in Montevideo? OpenStand? Can you
provide a reference <br>
to something supporting this assertion?</blockquote><br>
John,<br>
I only refer to Michel Gauthier's evaluation of the ICANN BoD (in annex).
ICANN joined with OpenStand people as per the BoD strategy of coalition
to start an effort to form an Internet cooperation. <br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">> - everyone but ICANN agreed
upon an economic vision of IG in order to define the technology
development paradigm. However, it did not define as to who will be the
ultimate decision taker for OpenStand (i.e. the whole digital
technology), what IAB/ISOC is for the network part of that
technology.<br>
<br>
Who is _everyone_ in the above remark, and again, can your provide
a pointer <br>
to this statement of an "economic vision of IG" that was
agreed to? The only <br>
outcome that I am aware of is Montevideo Statement on the Future
of Internet <br>
Cooperation - is this the statement of "economic vision"
that you refer to?</blockquote><br>
Every signatoree and endorser of OpenStand. RFC 6852 describe an
"economic vision of IG in order to define the technology development
paradigm" which calls for:<br>
1. Cooperation between standards organizations, <br>
2. Adherence to principles of Due process, Broad consensus, Transparency,
Balance, Openness, <br>
3. Collective empowerment based on technical merit, to provide global
interoperability, scalability, stability, and resiliency; enable global
competition; serve as building blocks for further innovation; and
contribute to the creation of global communities, benefiting
humanity.<br>
4. Availability. Standards specifications are made accessible to
all for implementation and deployment (FRAND).<br>
5. Voluntary adoption. Standards are voluntarily adopted and
success is determined by the market.<br><br>
jfc<br><br>
<br><br>
At 00:09 21/02/2014, Michel Gauthier wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">At 13:37 20/02/2014, McTim
wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-17feb14-en.htm">
http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-17feb14-en.htm</a>
</blockquote><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">On 28 September 2013, the Board
directed the President and CEO to work towards the establishment of a
coalition to start an effort to form an Internet cooperation agenda, and
to do so in a manner consistent with ICANN's mission. </blockquote><br>
So, Fadi only executed a plan voted 5 months ago by George, approved by
the NTIA, known by Adiel Akplogan and John Curan. So, I was correct in my
evaluation. <br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Following the September meeting,
the President and CEO executed the mandate of the 28 September 2013 Board
resolution and helped facilitate a number of activities, including:
</blockquote><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">(i) the expansion and launch of
a previously announced strategy panel now entitled "Panel on the
Future of Internet Governance;" <br>
(ii) development of and participation in the "1net initiative";
and<br>
(iii) encouraging the establishment of and support for a meeting on
multi-stakeholder Internet governance that is now likely to take place in
Brazil in April 2014.</blockquote><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">This is an Organizational
Administrative Function for which public comment is not
required.</blockquote><br>
Eventually ... the truth at last...<br><br>
M G</blockquote><br>
</body>
</html>