<html>
<body>
At 15:15 06/03/2014, McTim wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hi,<br>
I will try to dispel your misunderstanding:</blockquote><br>
I am afraid you do not in considering IPv4 and POTS.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:31 PM,
Michel Gauthier
<<a href="mailto:mg@telepresse.com">mg@telepresse.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<dl>
<dd>Dear Seth,<br><br>
<dd>My question may look silly, but I try to find where lies the real
political problem.<br>
<dd>as far I understand:<br>
<dd>1. if one country decides to use a chunk of IP addresses for its
citizens nobody will deny themand the calls will be routed.</blockquote>
</dl><br>
not answered. So, I presume as per previous positions on this list, the
response is yes, unless a RIR's person contradicts.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<dl>
<dd>2. if a relational space or a country and a language (not to speak of
a VN) decides to use another naming system than the DNS or another class
than class IN nothing will prevent it from doing so.<br>
</dl><br>
Correct, besides the lack of interoperability with the rest of the
Internet.</blockquote><br>
Who cares since it would be in a specific language?. <br><br>
M G</body>
</html>