<html>
<body>
At 14:19 15/03/2014, John Curran wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">On Mar 15, 2014, at 9:05 AM,
Michel Gauthier
<<a href="mailto:mg@telepresse.com">mg@telepresse.com</a>>
wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">... the March 14, 2014, alliance
of the 14 I*leaders (some say "USurpers" of the Multitude's
power).</blockquote><br>
Wait - I thought that was the "statUS-quo" team...
</blockquote><br>
tst, tst, tst. "statUS-quo" is the strategy. Supporters are
often qualified of USSH (US Stake/ShareHolders).<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""> must I update my glossary
so soon? </blockquote><br>
That depends on you. You were the one to join the coup.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">It is indeed remarkable how
quickly your terminology adapts to the circumstances - bravo
Michel!</blockquote><br>
I am a news analyst. Terminology being used is adapted to a clear
description of reality. It is obvious today that there is a split among
USSH between USurpers and reasonable people with a longer term vision or
a deeper concern for Millennium objectives, HRs and economic
development.<br><br>
I am not to judge if you made a smart move or a mistake, this is
up-to-you to evaluate and decide. But you signed, and this has an impact
my job is to analyse. Having been 13 could have been a bad omen :-)
<br><br>
M G<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">/John<br><br>
Disclaimer: My views alone.<br><br>
</blockquote></body>
</html>