<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Mar 16, 2014, at 8:46 PM, avri doria <<a href="mailto:avri@ella.com">avri@ella.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"><div><div>Hi. </div><div><br></div><div>I understand there isn't traffic.</div><div><br></div><div>Is all data in the iana registries, not just the root, openly published?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yup. There isn�t any access control on any of the registries. The whole purpose of IANA is to publish the data for everyone to use.</div><div><br></div><div>Steve</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size:75%">avri</div><div style="font-size:75%"><br></div><div style="font-size:75%">Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device</div><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com> <br>Date:03/16/2014 19:57 (GMT-05:00) <br>To: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> <br>Cc: "Stephen D. Crocker" <steve@shinkuro.com>,<a href="mailto:discuss@1net.org">discuss@1net.org</a> <br>Subject: Re: [discuss] [governance] NTIA statement <br><br>There really isn�t any data stored at IANA that isn�t already public except the correspondence between the TLD operator and IANA. There�s no traffic data.<br><br>Steve<br><br>On Mar 16, 2014, at 7:53 PM, Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>> wrote:<br><br>> <br>> <br>> On 16-Mar-14 19:22, Shatan, Gregory S. wrote:<br>>> The Snowden leaks provided a convenient soapbox for the EU and others<br>>> to climb on and demand this transition.<br>> <br>> While I believe many are milking the Snowden revelations for more than they should, I also believe that saying it has no bearing is wrong.<br>> <br>> The US has shown that it is willing to create laws that make pervasive monitoring over US citizens and non citizens legal. The US legalizes monitoring that other countries do not consider legal in respect to privacy laws or as being within the constraints of Human Rights. That means that under US Corporate and Patriot Act etc legislation the US could treat any data stored by IANA under any rules it likes. Without ever telling anyone. That is not insignificant.<br>> <br>> avri<br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> discuss mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:discuss@1net.org">discuss@1net.org</a><br>> <a href="http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br><br><br></steve@shinkuro.com></avri@acm.org></steve@shinkuro.com></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>