<html>
<body>
At 19:57 21/03/2014, 'Andrew Sullivan' wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">If you wish to argue there's a
subversion of process, you will need a<br>
better argument better than insinuation of this sort. We have
plenty<br>
of process problems around the Internet without making up new ones<br>
that we don't have.</blockquote><br>
RFC 3869, IAB:<br><br>
"The principal thesis of this document is that if commercial funding
is the main source of funding for future Internet research, the future of
the Internet infrastructure could be in trouble. In addition to issues
about which projects are funded, the funding source can also affect the
content of the research, for example, towards or against the development
of open standards, or taking varying degrees of care about the effect of
the developed protocols on the other traffic on the
Internet."<br><br>
ISOC:<br><br>
<h3><b>"Unqiue benefits for our Platinum Contributors</b></h3>
<ul>
<li>the opportunity to designate funds for sponsorship of specific
Internet activities and projects."
</ul>M G<br>
</body>
</html>