<html>
<body>
At 15:43 27/03/2014, Jorge Amodio wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Sure, don't forget to take your
meds with you on your way out ...<br><br>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Jefsey
<<a href="mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com">jefsey@jefsey.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<dl>
<dd>At 21:06 26/03/2014, Jorge Amodio wrote:<br>
<dl>
<dd>In plain English and without the diplomatic coating, get lost and
take your useless nonsense somewhere else.</blockquote>
</dl>
</dl><br>
It seems we have a Snowden II on the list. :-) <br><br>
Being the one submitted to this ad personam, I would like to stress that
whatever definition is given to MSism, one permits and protects free
expression even to this extent. Right or wrong, it gives decision makers
an exact evaluation of reality, something from which they are often
deprived.<br><br>
God bless!<br>
jfc<br><br>
<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<dl>
<dd>Dear Jorge,<br><br>
<dd>I presume that what you call a nonsense are VGN/VGNICs. I therefore
thank you for eventually clearly expressing the IG issue in rude terms. I
and others will certainly use them to show there are three positions at
stake and what are their problem: Strikling's, yours and mine.
Strikling's is brillant, mine is trying to express the resulting reality,
and yours defends what you always known which is passing away and has to
pass away in good conditions for all.<br><br>
<dd>I am sure every informed user understands your distress at the change
and hopes that you will understand as soon as possible the opportunity
Lawrence Strikling is offering to the US and possibly the world with the
cooperation of the Brazilian civil society. Nobody wants to know if this
is a carefully prepared alternative to Dubai or an intelligent response
to the WCIT vote, the question is to know if Lawrence Strikling's bet
succeeds and, most of all, how it succeeds in assembling the new digital
order.<br><br>
<dd>As one of the interlocutors engaged in this debate by historical job
and engagement, I cannot explain you why your position is sympathetic but
should not last too long if you do not want to embrass what is actually
being complexly engaged by your country and by no means stabilized. I
would however suggest you to join an NTIA think-tank on the situation, if
this exists, and contribute there. An happy conclusion of the current
debate can only benefit from aware members of the multitude having a
strong motivation for their technology and their country.<br><br>
<dd>jfc <br><br>
</dl></blockquote></body>
</html>