<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Michel, I carefully choose my words in my response to George (as I learn to do on this list): "voluntarily" and "suggestions". So you may want to consider my comment with that in mind until the SC discuss the issue an decide.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks.</div><div><br></div><div>- a.<br><br>Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On Mar 26, 2014, at 17:31, Michel Gauthier <<a href="mailto:mg@telepresse.com">mg@telepresse.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
At 12:07 26/03/2014, Adiel A. Akplogan (<a href="mailto:ceo@afrinic.net">ceo@afrinic.net</a> on iPad)
wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" class="cite" cite="">Thank you George, and thank for
these voluntary agreements and commitments from listers to adhere to
these "etiquettes and expectations" suggestions. The
Steering committee is meeting in Singapore this Friday and this in fact
was one of the Agenda item. So I'm sure they will also use these
suggestions as base of the discussion on the topic.
</blockquote><br>
In France the word for what you plan is "la police de la
pensée", the Though Police. /1net is open to any opinion as long as
it is what the absent BoD expects Sao Paulo Gov participants to
read.<br><br>
I was naive. I though that
<a href="mailto:ianatransition@icann.org">ianatransition@icann.org</a>
was about the NTIA transition to ICANN, and /1net was about the real
internet governance. <br><br>
- Actually
<a href="mailto:ianatransition@icann.org">ianatransition@icann.org</a> is
temporary until march 27 or april 7, or etc. (as long as it is
politically correct, with some dissenters enough to show there is no
bias, so NTIA can quote it) <br>
- and there is a need for some attrition on the /1net list for it to look
representative of the multi-statusholder community Montevideo
consenus.<br><br>
Fair enough. <br><br>
<br>
M G<br><br>
</div></blockquote></body></html>