<p dir="ltr">Avri,</p>
<p dir="ltr">I'm aware of that. As you know, the discussion was and is whether being open and being inclusive are the same thing. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Ciao,</p>
<p dir="ltr">Andrea<br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 31, 2014 7:58 AM, "Avri Doria" <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
On 31-Mar-14 01:33, Andrea Glorioso wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
By the way, whether this is done with the "broad involvement of all<br>
stakeholders" is a different issue. I don't believe in this or other<br>
cases it has been or is currently the case<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
No limitations on who can do a review.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:discuss@1net.org" target="_blank">discuss@1net.org</a><br>
<a href="http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" target="_blank">http://1net-mail.1net.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div>