<html>
<body>
At 16:32 02/04/2014, Alejandro Pisanty wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">What specifically have you
tried, say in the IETF or in an ICANN constituency, that hasn't worked?
<br><br>
The demand for legitimacy cuts two ways. The legitimacy of claims like
yours can also be substantiated in such a way that it contributes to
focus the discussion on its subject instead of leading it into further
layers of abstraction. </blockquote><br>
Absolutely true. <br>
<br>
This is why the IETF has accepted to create the IUCG for the IUsers,
internet informed users, after they fundamentally enhanced the general
perception of the internet technology (even if this is not yet fully
swallowed and digested by the community), showing and making it
documented (RFC 4646, RFC 5895) that IUsers� diversity (in that case
multilinguistic) was supported by subsidiarity at the fringe (as per RFC
1958). <br><br>
The IUCG adds an IUse touch to the IETF: "We reject kings,
presidents and voting. We believe in rough consensus and running
code" in adding "and leaving mode", i.e. not only working
seamlessly but also being integrated in the people's daily internet
use.<br><br>
What is interesting is the rejection of the resulting VGN generalization
as a fundamental element of the internet by this /1net list and the
confusion created by the IANA transition, the IANxfer lists, etc. As
several pointed it out, this leads this debate to stay in
unreality.<br><br>
This is why we will now stop these endless discussions going to nowhere
and focus on the real transition work.<br><br>
1. the top zone files for each class (HomeRoot project).<br>
2. the extension of the IANA to the technological diversity (SuperIANA
project) <br>
3. the exploration of IUser VGN friendly addressing (Happy-IP project)
<br>
4. the multitechnology digital namespaces aggregation documentation
(<a href="http://dnsa.org/">http://DNSA.org</a>) <br><br>
In order to proceed with method and order, we will concentrate on *work*
and not discussion on
<a href="http://dnsa.org/mailman/listinfo/agora_dnsa.org">
http://dnsa.org/mailman/listinfo/agora_dnsa.org</a> following an open
polycratic approach consistent with the IETF standardization process, but
not subject to the IETF Trust and to the US laws. Should someone attempt
to censor the DNSA work it is placed under the WSIS enhanced cooperation
spirit and international cyber law (cf. Tallinn manual). The DNSA
disclaimer is adapted from Wikipedia's.<br><br>
I thank all of those who want to switch to the real world and contribute
to the replacement of the NTIA by us, the contributing multitude of the
people.<br>
jfc<br><br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>