<p dir="ltr">sent from Google nexus 4<br>
kindly excuse brevity and typos.<br>
On 4 Apr 2014 18:58, "nathalie coupet" <<a href="mailto:nathaliecoupet@yahoo.com">nathaliecoupet@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hello All,<br>
><br>
> Could you be able to tell me whether First Net is an Intranet, another internet (with another root, and name-space resolution system)? <br>
><br>
>From the set of principles [1]; the watcher seem to avoid being watched, it also seem to be a backup plan just incase the unforeseen happens to the almighty internet ;)</p>
<p dir="ltr">First and foremost, the FirstNet network is being built for public safety. The purpose of the network is to provide a broadband wireless communications to police officers, firefighters, paramedics and other public safety and support personnel to meet their important mission every day.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Cheers!<br>
1. <a href="http://firstnet.gov/about/guiding-principles">http://firstnet.gov/about/guiding-principles</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">> Why would it be inconceivable to admit that BGP needs an overhaul? I'm sure all governments must be working on ways to put their critical infrastructure on another switch-packet system with maybe F2F connectivity? Black nets? Or something else? Please explain what possibilities there are for governments to safeguard their critical infrastructure:<br>
> 1) within the current Internet infrastructure<br>
> 2) with another internet <br>
> <br>
> Thank you!<br>
><br>
> Nathalie<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> discuss mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:discuss@1net.org">discuss@1net.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>
</p>