<p dir="ltr">sent from Google nexus 4<br>
kindly excuse brevity and typos.<br>
On 16 Apr 2014 01:34, "Louis Pouzin (well)" <<a href="mailto:pouzin@well.com">pouzin@well.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> The internet architecture was designed 40 years ago.<br>
> It was an experimental system. It still is.<br>
> Temple guardians die hard.<br>
> We need a new architecture, at last.<br>
> <br>
What human made innovation/invention did not start as an experiment. The internet whether is still an experiment or not, all I know is that the hypothesis has yielded positive results. If you want to improve on it by proposing solutions that improves on it's usability/functionality while making it as open as it is please go ahead through the relevant processes (presumably the IETF, W3C etc)</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards.<br>
> Louis.<br>
> - - -<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:29 AM, S Moonesamy <<a href="mailto:sm%2B1net@elandsys.com">sm+1net@elandsys.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi Carlos,<br>
>><br>
>> At 14:47 15-04-2014, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> A bit more than six years passed, and what we see? Relevant and frightening examples of the frailty of the current "governance" or coordination model of the network -- mostly in the expert hands basically of the I* group of entities and forums, which goes beyond just names, numbers and protocols, and badly in need of fixing (and I assume that the fix in general will involve more than just technical coordination measures):<br>
>>><br>
>>> - The net was revealed as incredibly vulnerable by the revelations on NSA surveillance, and we discovered that the NIST was at cahoots with the NSA in "backdooring" the cryptographic systems.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Noted.<br>
><br>
> <br>
> [snip] <br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> discuss mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:discuss@1net.org">discuss@1net.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>
</p>