<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    "Designed" is perhaps a too deliberate term to describe what
    evolved.&nbsp; IPV4-6 transition has demonstrated a sliver of complexity
    of revision in operation.&nbsp; Could we find&nbsp; way to incrementally
    evolve the Internet architecture in the right the direction so that
    we do so with greater stability and continuity? A new architecture
    could be the destination; I'm worried about the speed bumps and spin
    outs along the way...<br>
    <br>
    Joe<br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/15/2014 8:33 PM, Louis Pouzin
      (well) wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CA+EjHYpd4iud0fjvxi6xw=Ype4u-x+PpNvbGxhunJ20ttzPjrw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <div>The internet architecture was designed 40 years ago.<br>
              </div>
              It was an experimental system. It still is.<br>
            </div>
            Temple guardians die hard.<br>
            We need a new architecture, at last.<br>
          </div>
          &nbsp;.<br>
        </div>
        Louis.<br>
        - - -<br>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:29 AM, S Moonesamy <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a
              moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:sm+1net@elandsys.com"
              target="_blank">sm+1net@elandsys.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi
              Carlos,
              <div class=""><br>
                At 14:47 15-04-2014, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:<br>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                  .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                  A bit more than six years passed, and what we see?
                  Relevant and frightening examples of the frailty of
                  the current "governance" or coordination model of the
                  network -- mostly in the expert hands basically of the
                  I* group of entities and forums, which goes beyond
                  just names, numbers and protocols, and badly in need
                  of fixing (and I assume that the fix in general will
                  involve more than just technical coordination
                  measures):<br>
                  <br>
                  - The net was revealed as incredibly vulnerable by the
                  revelations on NSA surveillance, and we discovered
                  that the NIST was at cahoots with the NSA in
                  "backdooring" the cryptographic systems.<br>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
              </div>
              Noted.</blockquote>
            <div>&nbsp;</div>
            <div>[snip] <br>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:discuss@1net.org">discuss@1net.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>