<div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>+1</div><div><br></div><div>Let form follow function.</div><div><br></div><div>Alejandro Pisanty</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Avri Doria <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
<br>
> *From:*Ian Peter [mailto:<a href="mailto:ian.peter@ianpeter.com">ian.peter@ianpeter.com</a>]<br>
<br>
> I agree with your point Michael. I am travelling now, but I think you<br>
> should make the point in NetMundial document somehow that extending<br>
> multistakeholderism to all aspects on governance “on the internet” could<br>
> be problematic and does not have universal agreement.<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
Of course no point of view has universal agreement, no matter how small<br>
or large the group.<br>
<br>
I beleive that some form of multistakeholderism is appropriate for any<br>
Internet governance issue. I argue that a uni-stakeholder system is<br>
_never_ appropriate for the Internet. Or anywhere else for that matter.<br>
<br>
Though I would agree that extending any one system to the Internet is<br>
going to be problematic. What is most problematic is the view that<br>
multistakeholderism only consists of one model, or that any form of the<br>
model is the solution to all issues. Each issue has an appropriate form<br>
of the multistakeholder model, different sets of actors, roles and<br>
responsibilities. The difficulty is coming to consensus on the proper mix.<br>
<br>
Just wanted to make sure we knew that we did not have universal<br>
agreement on your statement. I may be alone, but I think that<br>
multistakeholderism, in its variety of expressions and modalities of<br>
participatory democracy, is the only way forward possible. Anything<br>
else leaves some relevant actors outside the solution and is<br>
fundamentally anti-democratic.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:discuss@1net.org">discuss@1net.org</a><br>
<a href="http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" target="_blank">http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty<br>Facultad de Química UNAM<br>Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico<br>
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD<br>+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475<br>Blog: <a href="http://pisanty.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://pisanty.blogspot.com</a><br>LinkedIn: <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty</a><br>
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614</a><br>Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/apisanty" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/apisanty</a><br>
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, <a href="http://www.isoc.org" target="_blank">http://www.isoc.org</a><br>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
</div>