<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:22 PM, JFC Morfin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com" target="_blank">jefsey@jefsey.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">At 00:21 24/01/2015, parminder wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
One is a civil society forum, the other a multistakeholder one.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Hi! Parminder,<br>
I have a real difficulty understanding why you civil society activist continue using the "multistakeholder" discriminatroy concept and do not rally the omnistakeholder non discriminatory vision. Everyone is to be accepted as a network co-owner/builder and a co-decision member (through the pragmantic mechanisms of influence, synergy and emergence).<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The above is how I have seen "multistakeholderism" played out in (non-Geneva based) IG settings.<br><br></div><div>"Everyone is a co-decision maker" is the essence of the MS model.<br></div><div><br><br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
jfc<br>
<br>
</font></span><br>____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>.<br>
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits" target="_blank">http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>