Hi all<div><br></div><div>InternetNZ has made some comments in response to the second NTIA Stewardship transition proposal from the names community, available here:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-22apr15/msg00014.html" target="_blank">http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-22apr15/msg00014.html</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>The doc responds to many of the specific questions set out in the public comment template, and relates this second draft proposal against the principles we had set out in response to the first draft (principles that are similar to those the CWG itself has established for the stewardship transition).</div><div><br></div><div>I append the summary points here:</div><div><br></div><div><div style="color:rgba(0,0,0,0.701961);font-family:UICTFontTextStyleBody;font-size:17px"><p class="s10" style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:6px"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"><span class="s9">InternetNZ: </span></span></p><div class="s12" style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:71px"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"><span class="s11">• </span><span class="s9">Supports the </span><span class="s9">CWG</span><span class="s9">’s</span><span class="s9"> Second Proposal</span><span class="s9"> as being </span><span class="s9">largely consistent with InternetNZ’s principles, subject to detail</span><span class="s9"> being confirmed</span></span></div><div class="s12" style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:71px"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"><span class="s11">• </span><span class="s9">Support</span><span class="s9">s</span><span class="s9"> the overall framework of a separated Post-Transition IANA</span></span></div><div class="s12" style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:71px"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"><span class="s11">• </span><span class="s9">Support</span><span class="s9">s</span><span class="s9"> a contract between PTI and ICANN</span></span></div><div class="s12" style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:71px"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"><span class="s11">• </span><span class="s9">Reluctantly acquiesce</span><span class="s9">s</span><span class="s9"> to ICANN becoming the entity through which community stewardship of the DNS is exercised (through IFR and SRs) </span></span></div><div class="s12" style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:71px"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"><span class="s11">• </span><span class="s9">Support</span><span class="s9">s</span><span class="s9"> service level obligations that match current performance, not inadequate current </span><span class="s9">SoW </span><span class="s9">obligations</span></span></div><div class="s12" style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:71px"><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"><span class="s11">• </span><span class="s9">Notes that more</span><span class="s9"> detail </span><span class="s9">is </span><span class="s9">needed on key components including escalation paths, the PTI, the IANA Functions Review and the Separation Review</span></span></div></div></div><div><br></div>If you have any questions or thoughts, very keen to discuss sometime next week.<div><br></div><div>best</div><div>Jordan</div>
<br><br>-- <br>Jordan Carter<br>Chief Executive, InternetNZ<p>+64-21-442-649 | <a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a><p>Sent on the run, apologies for brevity<br></p></p>