<div dir="ltr"><div>Hello everyone. Nicolas Fiumarelli from Youth IGF Uruguay.</div><div>Like Ian, I think the fact that 4 years have passed from this activity makes me reflect and think, since then there has been no activity that has a multistakeholder mechanism as strong as it was when the call for comments on the statement happened. If there is any way to rescue that technology, which allowed comments on the paragraphs online. I think it was a very good moment, in fact I can say with certainty that that was the boom of the technology applied to multistakeholder modeling for creating agreements between hundreds of interested parties .. And as Ian said, I do not like the idea of waiting for things to be in resolved <span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">nation states acting unilaterally </span>when we already have experience of these digital and dynamic multistakeholder ways of resolving things. My advice is to return to these practices where technology takes a particular role in making decisions or "agreements." I repeat, I have not seen an activity as transparent and open as it was the setting of that statement in NETMundial.<br><br>Nico Fiumarelli.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2018-04-25 20:16 GMT-03:00 Nnenna Nwakanma <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nnenna75@gmail.com" target="_blank">nnenna75@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>I am interested in this conversation<br><br></div>Nnenna<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:45 PM, <a href="mailto:ian.peter@ianpeter.com" target="_blank">ian.peter@ianpeter.com</a> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ian.peter@ianpeter.com" target="_blank">ian.peter@ianpeter.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5">
<div><div>Just noticed that we have reached 4 years since this statement - and reading it again, it still has a lot of valid things to say.</div><div><br></div><a href="http://netmundial.br/netmundial-multistakeholder-statement/" target="_blank">http://netmundial.br/netmundia<wbr>l-multistakeholder-statement/</a>
<div><br></div><div>Sadly, however, there seems to be no current initiative or any on the horizon capable of addressing the global problems raised then, which are getting worse and taking on new dimensions.</div><div><br></div><div>Do we just give up? Or just rely on nation states acting unilaterally to somehow resolve these problems when unilateral action is not sufficient and in some cases it isn't in their perceived interests to take any action whatsoever?</div><span class="m_-2929934917161820246HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Ian Peter</div></font></span></div><br></div></div>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:discuss@1net.org" target="_blank">discuss@1net.org</a><br>
<a href="http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://1net-mail.1net.org/mail<wbr>man/listinfo/discuss</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:discuss@1net.org">discuss@1net.org</a><br>
<a href="http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://1net-mail.1net.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>