[discuss] Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013

[Seun Ojedeji]

++1

sent from Google nexus 4
On 25 Dec 2013 01:53, "Jorge Amodio" <jmamodio at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> IPv4 -> IPv6 s not a problem to solve, it's just a job to do.
>
> On the long term it will become a problem for those that delay it's
> implementation since as we advance into new technologies to support the
> Internet of Things (6LoWPAN for example) many innovations will not be
> available for IPv4 and that will become a competitive disadvantage for some
> service providers.
>
> -Jorge
>
> > On Dec 24, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Grigori Saghyan <gregor at arminco.com> wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Let us remember Y2000 problem. Looks IPv4-->IPv6 transition problem is
> > from the same range. If it will be a vital problem, business will
> > find a way, how to resolve this problem - there are lot of solutions.
> > I think it is an artificial problem, but of course, after few years it
> > will be necessary to find a solution, but without ITU :)
> > Grigori Saghyan
> > ISOC.AM
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131225/596c107c/attachment-0001.html>