[discuss] [governance] Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013

Sat Dec 28 02:20:56 UTC 2013

>
>
> >> There is little doubt (at least in my mind) that a seated 1net
> coordinating committee can
> >> establish exactly what role 1net will take on with respect to making
> appointments to any
> >> international meeting committees.
> >
> > I thought 1net was being proposed as an open discussion platform, not an
> appointments and committee generating entity.
> >
> > Feels like you guys are pushing too hard to create additional hats and
> chairs without yet making it clear what are the real intentions behind 1net.
>
> Jorge -
>
>    I frankly couldn't care less whether 1net makes any appointments to any
> committees;
>    it is indeed intended as an open discussion platform.   I simply
> believe that it is polite
>    for 1net to respond in some manner if asked to make appointments.
>

I find very hard to digest that something that is an abstract entity can
provide a response, in name of who ? and named by who ?

I really DO care because all this yada yada at the end is being paid for
the fees imposed to the end users, which are also the source for paying
your salary.

-J
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131227/c15a76c3/attachment.html>