[discuss] [IANAtransition] A Summary of IANA Oversight Transition Tasks and Issues

[Naresh Ajwani]

I agree but both shud come under same/common framework of laws.

Regards & best wishes

Naresh Ajwani
On 2 Apr 2014 09:53, "Joseph Alhadeff" <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:

> We all have a vested interest in road safety, but not everyone should
> repair cars or pave roads.  There are topics related to the rules and
> overall administration of the system which need to be inclusive but there
> are operational elements which depend on skills and expertise. Where and
> how do we draw those boundaries?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Apr 1, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/04/2014 13:16, David Conrad wrote:
> >> Brian,
> >>
> >>> On Apr 2, 2014, at 4:19 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Those with a vested interest are the least trustworthy overseers.
> >>
> >> Without commenting on the DNSA or other structural separation proposals:
> >>
> >> The IETF oversees the operation of the protocol parameter function.
> >> The RIRs oversee the operation of the numbers allocation function.
> >>
> >> Both of these entities would appear to have vested interest.
> >
> > Well, I guess everybody has a vested interest when you come down
> > to it. Isn't that the reason for having all stakeholders involved,
> > so that no vested interest can predominate? However, in this
> > game, it seems to be the case that DNS registrars have a very
> > specific and direct financial interest.
> >
> >   Brian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss at 1net.org
> > http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140402/68e22d32/attachment-0001.html>