[discuss] Wikileaks releases Penultimate NetMundial Outcome Document
mg at telepresse.com
Wed Apr 9 10:16:11 UTC 2014
At 09:32 09/04/2014, parminder wrote:
>On Wednesday 09 April 2014 02:16 AM, Michel Gauthier wrote:
>>>At 17:56 08/04/2014, Pranesh Prakash wrote:
>>The number of occurences of some words:
>democracy 0, multistakeholder - 17
>people - 4, stakeholder - 34
>Compare this with any other key political document related to
>constitutional moments like the Netmundial meetings - you will find
>repeated references to people and democracy, and hardly any to
>stakeholders and MSism.....
>A silent political revolution is taking place, right under our
>noses, as the proverbial Nero plays the flute...
I tend to follow JFC's analysis that Machiavel has created the
"multitude" concept of free self-determinated people and that we are
embodying it in permitting them to interconnect easily, allowing
polycracy to emerge aside monarchy, aristrocracy, and democracy.
Wikipedia explains that "Modern depictions of aristocracy tend to
regard it not as a legitimate aristocracy (rule by the best), but
rather as a <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy>plutocracy (rule
by the rich)".
MSism depiction is a rule by the stakeholders, i.e.:
- either those being entrusted responsibilities, what is a variation
- or those involved in or affected by a course of action, what is:
- democracy if there is vote
- polycracy if there is a decision emergence (cf. different works
on the DET, decision emergence theory).
==> question for this: what is a stakeholder? Is this revolution a
progression or a regression?
Tne debate seems therefore to be:
1. the largest nulber of contributors:
>>Human rights 11
>>domain name 0
>>Interesting indication of the political priorities.
>>discuss mailing list
>><mailto:discuss at 1net.org>discuss at 1net.org
>discuss mailing list
>discuss at 1net.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss