[discuss] we need to fix what may be broken

[Seun Ojedeji]

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 16 Apr 2014 01:34, "Louis Pouzin (well)" <pouzin at well.com> wrote:
>
> The internet architecture was designed 40 years ago.
> It was an experimental system. It still is.
> Temple guardians die hard.
> We need a new architecture, at last.
>
What human made innovation/invention did not start as an experiment. The
internet whether is still an experiment or not, all I know is that the
hypothesis has yielded positive results. If you want to improve on it by
proposing solutions that improves on it's usability/functionality while
making it as open as it is please go ahead through the relevant processes
(presumably the IETF, W3C etc)

Regards.
> Louis.
> - - -
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:29 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+1net at elandsys.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> At 14:47 15-04-2014, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>>>
>>> A bit more than six years passed, and what we see? Relevant and
frightening examples of the frailty of the current "governance" or
coordination model of the network -- mostly in the expert hands basically
of the I* group of entities and forums, which goes beyond just names,
numbers and protocols, and badly in need of fixing (and I assume that the
fix in general will involve more than just technical coordination measures):
>>>
>>> - The net was revealed as incredibly vulnerable by the revelations on
NSA surveillance, and we discovered that the NIST was at cahoots with the
NSA in "backdooring" the cryptographic systems.
>>
>>
>> Noted.
>
>
> [snip]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140416/89c39780/attachment.html>