[discuss] Possible approaches to solving "problem no. 1"

[Steve Crocker]

On Feb 16, 2014, at 8:20 PM, Michel Gauthier <mg at telepresse.com> wrote:

> At 01:36 17/02/2014, Steve Crocker wrote:
>> However, the change would be noted very quickly, probably within minutes, and alarms would sound around the world.  System administrators and other technical people would quickly adjust the operations of their systems to mitigate the impact.
> 
> Dear Steve,
> 
> what you document is that everyone can mitigate a removal of a TLD from the root.

If country X were taken out of the root, it would take coordinated and concerted action by a large number of people around the world to restore service to that TLD's domains.  That sort of effort would come into existence only if there were widespread outrage.  It's not something that is easily done nor easily tested in isolation.

> I suppose there is no intrinsic difference with mitigating the removal of all the TLDs, i.e. the removal of the root? This means there are two strategies that can be followed (alternatively or in parallel):
> 
> - to be ready to mitigate
> - or/and to install a permanent mitigating solution under the form of an homeroot experimentation.
> 
> You explain that "root zone entries have a 48 hour time-to-live (TTL), which means it will take two days before all of the caches around the world are drained of the old entry.  Put a another way, the impact would be about 2% per hour." This means that a daily run of the projected EZOP application is enough to keep an HomeRoot in tune with the top zone reality?
> 
> Do you have some figures on what EZOP wants to report in addition to the root file, i.e. the number of name servers declared via the TLD zone files which are not listed in the root file (I do not know how one calls them)?

Perhaps I haven't been following closely enough.  What's "EZOP"?  What do you mean by "name servers declared via the TLD zone files which are not listed in the root file"?

Steve