[discuss] Possible approaches to solving "problem no. 1"

Shatan, Gregory S. GShatan at ReedSmith.com
Thu Feb 20 22:07:43 UTC 2014


Understood – I am put in mind of protests at various G8 and G20 summits, etc. against “globalization” as such.  That still doesn’t equal USG/NSA control (not saying that is your position, Ian).

Greg

From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On Behalf Of Ian Peter
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:56 PM
To: John Curran; Louis Pouzin (well); Michel Gauthier
Cc: 1Net List
Subject: Re: [discuss] Possible approaches to solving "problem no. 1"

the word globalisation has different meanings to different people and I refer you to the anti-globalisation  movement, which sees globalisation as a word for transnational corporate control without government regulation (and you can see the ramifications of that in an internet setting in terms of economic dominance). Probably not the most sensitive word for ICANN to use given its connotations to many people, but I’m not sure what the best substitute is.



From: Michel Gauthier<mailto:mg at telepresse.com>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 8:18 AM
To: John Curran<mailto:jcurran at istaff.org> ; Louis Pouzin (well)<mailto:pouzin at well.com>
Cc: 1Net List<mailto:discuss at 1net.org>
Subject: Re: [discuss] Possible approaches to solving "problem no. 1"

At 20:43 20/02/2014, John Curran wrote:

On Feb 20, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Louis Pouzin (well) <pouzin at well.com<mailto:pouzin at well.com>> wrote:

Global(ization) mentioned 25 times, i.e. USG/NSA control.

Louis -
    For those us not quite as astute, could you unpack the above a little bit,
   (In particular, I'm trying to figure the how use of global implies USG control)

Please, not again!
:-)
________________________________
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss at 1net.org<mailto:discuss at 1net.org>
http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



* * *

This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your cooperation.

* * *

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140220/c4a71d38/attachment.html>


More information about the discuss mailing list