[discuss] - questions of consent and influence
Steve Crocker
steve at shinkuro.com
Fri Feb 21 14:19:07 UTC 2014
Bill,
Thanks for this piece of historical information. Is a copy of the signed document available online somewhere?
I think a Boswell and an ombudsman are two different roles. Both are valuable and necessary. Jon may have embodied both, but that was unusual. Those functions are both necessary now, but they need to split.
Steve
On Feb 21, 2014, at 3:12 AM, manning bill <bmanning at isi.edu> wrote:
>
> Reviewing the history of the gravitas that settled on Jon Postel in his role as IANA, a few things emerged:
>
> 1- For nearly two decades, there was tacit agreement by the developer and user community that Jon would act as an ombudsman, in Vint Cerfs words, “Our Boswell”
> To save time, the reference is to James Boswell, 9th Laird of Auchinleck (29 October 1740 – 19 May 1795) was a lawyer, diarist, and author born in Edinburgh, Scotland. Boswell's surname has passed into the English language as a term (Boswell, Boswellian, Boswellism) for a constant companion and observer, especially one who records those observations in print. (wikipedia)
>
> In 1987, there was the Lake Arrowhead meeting, <ADVANCED COMPUTER COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP> with the following participants from academia, business, and government:
> PARTICIPANTS
>
> Tony Acampora AT&T-BTL
> Gordon Bell National Science Foundation
> Craig Bender O'Dowd Research
> Ken Biba Biba Associates
> Dick Binder M/A-COM
> Dave Blauvelt ITT
> Len Bosack cisco
> Hans-Werner Braun University of Michigan
> Ross W. Callon Bolt Beranek and Newman
> Vinton G. Cerf NRI
> Greg Chesson SGI
> David Cheriton Stanford
> Wesley Clark CRA
> Danny Cohen USC-ISI
> Chase J. Cotton Bellcore
> Gary Delp University of Delaware
> Deborah Estrin USC
> David J. Farber University of Delaware
> John G. Fletcher LLNL
> A.G. (Sandy) Fraser AT&T-BTL
> Steven N. Goldstein NASA-HQ/MITRE
> Ken Ingram AT&T-BTL
> Richard Johnsson DEC-SRC
> Robert E. Kahn NRI
> Steve J. Lukasik Northrop
> Jim Mathis SRI International
> Dave Mills University of Delaware
> Jeffrey C. Mogul DEC-WRL
> Joel Morrow NYNEX
> Brendon O'Dowd O'Dowd Research
> Eli Pasternak Telestream
> Jon Postel USC-ISI
> Larry G. Roberts Net-Express
> Daniel Sheinbein AT&T-BTL
> W. D. Sincoskie Bellcore
> Dan Swinehart Xerox-PARC
> Jonathan Turner Washington University
> Dono Van Mierop Fibronics
>
> Some of these names/organizations may be familiar, some not so much. In the Postel archives, there is a document, signed by each of these people, representing their organizations, that they would
> respect and abide by the naming and numbering choices arbitrated by Jon. As far as I can tell, this is the first written agreement of the consent of the governed to abide by the choices made by Jon.
> This “tasking” was folded into the Tera Node Technology award from DARPA and then migrated via NSF to oversight by NTIA.
>
>
> So for me, two key elements of effective IG must include:
>
> - an ombudsman/boswellian role as documenting the authoritative state of affairs
> and
> - consent of the governed.
>
> Its hard to see both of these attributes in the proposals tabled to date.
>
>
>
> /bill
> Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the discuss
mailing list