[discuss] global cyber sovereignty [was discuss Digest, Vol 3, Issue 67, etc.]
sm+1net at elandsys.com
Sun Feb 23 16:11:36 UTC 2014
At 02:31 23-02-2014, Elisabeth Blanconil wrote:
>This is why information are only to be considered as case
>illustrations. Better if they can be confirmed as you did for ICP-1
>and DCRI/Wikimedia France. The other hypothetical
I did not confirm anything. "Wikimedia France" was not mentioned in
the message I replied to.
>I suppose that you refer to the incredible hoax of the single unique
>authoritative root with its mathematical (US) hierarchy for an MS
>global world distributed on an equal footing basis.
More information about the discuss