[discuss] governments and rule of law (was: Possible approaches to solving...)
jcurran at arin.net
Wed Feb 26 20:59:25 UTC 2014
Still confused here... Why wouldn't these simply be remanded back to be clarified?
On Feb 26, 2014, at 12:11 PM, "Alejandro Pisanty" <apisanty at gmail.com<mailto:apisanty at gmail.com>> wrote:
although the situationn in this respect seems to be improving constantly, there have been instances in which the proposals aren't as clear as they seem if you are the party to take action on them, the community support may be less than unequivocal, or combinations of both. And as said, this is not unique to ICANN. Also not unique, demands for transparency and accountability in the process being asymmetrical.
I think Steve Crocker has described the responses very well.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:44 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net<mailto:jcurran at arin.net>> wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty at gmail.com<mailto:apisanty at gmail.com>> wrote:
> It is not unusual to leave some tough decisions not made and "kicked upwards" to the Board. There are many good reasons why this can happen ...
Excuse my confusion; why would there be need for change
to the policies for Internet identifier management, if the change
wasn't both clearly stated and supported by the community?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Facultad de Química UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss