[discuss] Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013

Thu Jan 2 18:48:14 UTC 2014

Hartmut +1 :-))

Bertrand

"*Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes*", Antoine de
Saint Exupéry
("*There is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans*")BERTRAND DE
LA CHAPELLE Internet & Jurisdiction Project | Directoremail
bdelachapelle at internetjurisdiction.net email bdelachapelle at gmail.com
twitter @IJurisdiction <https://twitter.com/IJurisdiction> |
@bdelachapelle<https://twitter.com/bdelachapelle>
mobile +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32www.internetjurisdiction.net [image: A GLOBAL
MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE PROCESS]

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Hartmut Glaser <glaser at cgi.br> wrote:

> Please replace the subject ...!
>
> Prof.
> Hartmut Glaser
>
> > On 02/01/2014, at 13:22, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> On 02-Jan-14 09:41, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>    Agree Avri, and this is the kind of reasoning that we, from the
> >>    technical community, must be open enough to agree to explore …. We
> >>    should not bash out  perceived (or even sometime very real) problems
> >>    just because no one want to work on new technical challenge that
> >>    addressing the issue may pose.
> >>
> >>
> >> Perceived problems are not problems. If you base technical analysis and
> >> development based on perception you will get perceived solutions.
> >>
> >> My .02
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > When doing risk or impact analysis, however, one has nothing but
> perceived problems - it is not until later that one finds out how the world
> actually unfolded. Sometimes, when impact analysis, planning, design and
> implementation do their job properly, the perceived problems are dealt with
> easily.  Sometimes a perceived problem is just a problem averted. And
> sometimes a perceive problem is just that, a possible that never became
> actual.
> >
> > In terms of perceived problems, IPv4 has been running out since the
> early 1990s - I think that was when I saw the first projections.   With
> approximately half of the addresses still unused today, one can ask: to
> what extent this particular perceived problem turned into a self fulfilling
> prophecy?  So yes, one has to be careful with the risk and impact analyses
> to not become so dedicated to ones own perceived problem set, one actually
> brings it about.
> >
> > avri
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss at 1net.org
> > http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140102/e669dc62/attachment.html>