[discuss] [governance] Re: CI case in itself was Re:   Representative Multistakeholder model validity
Louis Pouzin (well)
pouzin at well.com
Sun Jan 19 12:47:28 UTC 2014
+1 with Parminder
It's like a dieticians convention excluding local doctors because they are
not active on the dieticians discussion list.
- - -
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 12:30 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>wrote:
> On Sunday 19 January 2014 09:40 AM, Adam Peake wrote:
>> On Jan 19, 2014, at 12:57 PM, michael gurstein wrote:
>> There are several other associated lists but this is the main one.
>> Could you point to any discussions about Internet governance, I'm finding
>> it hard to even see any real debate/community input to the declaration you
>> often mention. And any discussion about interest in the Brazil meeting and
>> process: other than email from yourself, Parminder and other IT for Change
>> staff, and Norbert, who are all active/leaders of other civil society
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss