[discuss] Problem statement P1

[John Curran]

On Jan 20, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:

> John Curran <jcurran at istaff.org> wrote:
>> ...
>> Norbert - 
>> 
>>  Can you suggest changes to the problem statement to incorporate
>> this issue? (or are you suggesting that there should be a third
>> problem statement?)
> 
> Maybe add after "2." and before "3.* the following:
> 
> 2a. It has been a requirement for the contractor providing the IANA
> function to be a US organization, resulting in the provision of the
> IANA function being subject to US law (including future changes) and
> the decisions of the US judiciary.

Norbert - 
 
  That seems like an excellent addition to me; it does not change the 
  problem being solve per se but provides useful context to the reader.

Thanks!
/John

Disclaimer: My views alone.