[discuss] Problem statement P1

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

I agree John, this clarifies the point... Thanks Norbert ...
On Jan 21, 2014 8:43 AM, "John Curran" <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:

> On Jan 20, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
>
> > John Curran <jcurran at istaff.org> wrote:
> >> ...
> >> Norbert -
> >>
> >>  Can you suggest changes to the problem statement to incorporate
> >> this issue? (or are you suggesting that there should be a third
> >> problem statement?)
> >
> > Maybe add after "2." and before "3.* the following:
> >
> > 2a. It has been a requirement for the contractor providing the IANA
> > function to be a US organization, resulting in the provision of the
> > IANA function being subject to US law (including future changes) and
> > the decisions of the US judiciary.
>
> Norbert -
>
>   That seems like an excellent addition to me; it does not change the
>   problem being solve per se but provides useful context to the reader.
>
> Thanks!
> /John
>
> Disclaimer: My views alone.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140121/ccd24e3e/attachment.html>