[discuss] P1 version 3: Added detail and a request for useful background information

[Jorge Amodio]

> On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:28 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> 
> On Jan 19, 2014, at 7:58 PM, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>>  
>>>> 3. The claim has apparently been made that both houses of the US Congress (Parliament) have overwhelmingly voted resolutions that direct the US government to maintain control over the root. [Can anyone provide references or pointers to such legislation, or to any evidence that this claim is not correct?]
>> 
>> OK, found the one from the Senate (110th Congress) that states that the IANA functions must remain based in the US.
>> 
>> http://beta.congress.gov/110/bills/sres564/BILLS-110sres564is.pdf
> 
> Note - That bill was not enacted <https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/sres564>

That is correct, there are others that passed the Senate or the House,

-J

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140121/8d0a96e4/attachment.html>