[discuss] P1 version 3: Added detail and a request for useful background information

George Sadowsky george.sadowsky at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 02:08:58 UTC 2014

So from this can we conclude that there has been no legislation passed in the US that demands US control over the root?  Or do we need further investigation?

On Jan 21, 2014, at 11:28 PM, John Curran wrote:

> On Jan 19, 2014, at 7:58 PM, Jorge Amodio <jmamodio at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 3. The claim has apparently been made that both houses of the US Congress (Parliament) have overwhelmingly voted resolutions that direct the US government to maintain control over the root. [Can anyone provide references or pointers to such legislation, or to any evidence that this claim is not correct?]
>> OK, found the one from the Senate (110th Congress) that states that the IANA functions must remain based in the US.
>> http://beta.congress.gov/110/bills/sres564/BILLS-110sres564is.pdf
> Note - That bill was not enacted <https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/sres564>
> FYI,
> /John]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140122/77d88954/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the discuss mailing list