[discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN
alliance at fsp4.net
Tue Jul 1 16:12:48 UTC 2014
At 11:57 28/06/2014, Chris Disspain wrote:
>>However if you think this particular 'point of law' has no
>>implication to the legal and jurisdictional status of ICANN and the
>>important global governance functions that is does, I will rest my case here.
>Speaking as a lawyer and a ccTLD manager a) I would be wary of
>drawing 'points of law' from a news story and b) even if the report
>is accurate, the decision does not have any implication to the legal
>and jurisdictional status of ICANN.
Speaking as people caring about their glocal digitality: a) we would
be wary of drawing technical operational trust from any comment on
points of any law and b) we would avoid using services of which the
stability and continuity could be subject to legal and juridictional
issues. Our need is for our machines to work 24/366 with the least
possible technical support and no legal counsel.
One of fsp4net could be survivor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss