[discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN

[Nigel Roberts]

I have NO IDEA what this means.

But if I use Google Translate to translate it first into French, and 
then into Swahili, it makes more sense then.



On 07/01/2014 05:12 PM, FSP4NET wrote:
> At 11:57 28/06/2014, Chris Disspain wrote:
>>> However if you think this particular 'point of law' has no
>>> implication to the legal and jurisdictional status of ICANN and the
>>> important global governance functions that is does, I will rest my
>>> case here.
>>
>> Speaking as a lawyer and a ccTLD manager a) I would be wary of drawing
>> ‘points of law’ from a news story and b) even if the report is
>> accurate, the decision does not have any implication to the legal and
>> jurisdictional status of ICANN.
>
> Dear Chris,
>
> Speaking as people caring about their glocal digitality: a) we would be
> wary of drawing technical operational trust from any comment on points
> of any law and b) we would avoid using services of which the stability
> and continuity could be subject to legal and juridictional issues. Our
> need is for our machines to work 24/366 with the least possible
> technical support and no legal counsel.
>
> One of fsp4net could be survivor
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>