[discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN
nashton at internet-ecosystem.org
Fri Jun 27 09:31:16 UTC 2014
- all the double-posting
There are so many completely factually untrue elements in these stories it is - almost - funny. The court clearly doesn't have a clue.
On 27 Jun 2014, at 11:24, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:22 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> For those not following on NANOG:
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the discuss