[discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN

Fri Jun 27 09:53:11 UTC 2014

But it is still a court which has evidently made a judgment.  

Hopefully next time they will consult with you or similar such experts but
until then...

M

-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On Behalf
Of Nick Ashton-Hart
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:31 AM
To: Bill Woodcock
Cc: 1Net List; governance at lists.igcaucus.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN

- all the double-posting

There are so many completely factually untrue elements in these stories it
is - almost - funny. The court clearly doesn't have a clue.

On 27 Jun 2014, at 11:24, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:

> 
> On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:22 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>
http://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-us-terror-victims-now-own-irans-interne
t/ 
> 
> For those not following on NANOG:
> 
>
http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Subpoena-Ben-Haim-02-1611-w
ith-Schedule-A.pdf
> 
>                                -Bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss