[discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN

michael gurstein gurstein at gmail.com
Fri Jun 27 09:53:11 UTC 2014

But it is still a court which has evidently made a judgment.  

Hopefully next time they will consult with you or similar such experts but
until then...


-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On Behalf
Of Nick Ashton-Hart
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:31 AM
To: Bill Woodcock
Cc: 1Net List; governance at lists.igcaucus.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Some more legal tangles for ICANN

- all the double-posting

There are so many completely factually untrue elements in these stories it
is - almost - funny. The court clearly doesn't have a clue.

On 27 Jun 2014, at 11:24, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:

> On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:22 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> For those not following on NANOG:
>                                -Bill
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

More information about the discuss mailing list