[discuss] Just Net Coalition contribution on Principles for Netmundial.br
Milton L Mueller
mueller at syr.edu
Fri Mar 7 20:22:12 UTC 2014
From: S Moonesamy [mailto:sm+1net at elandsys.com]
At 07:32 07-03-2014, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>Is there any economic evidence for this assertion?
> I'll skip the question.
I'll take that as a "no." You have no evidence for your assertion.
>A government sets the tax rates. That rate can be overly large;
>it can stifle commerce. It would be a matter for the people being
>governed to decide what they want to do about it.
One of the things they do about it is bypass the stifling factor. You seem to be saying that, as a matter of _Internet governance principle_, we should try to stop that. I disagree.
> I would not argue that there isn't corruption.
> I would not consider that as an internet problem.
If corruption-avoidance leads people to use the internet to bypass their system, and you try to stop them in the name of Internet governance, then it is an internet problem.
> I do not understand how the above can affect a person from
> a developed country. There is an existing venue for discussing
>about trade and tariffs.
Your first sentence makes no sense to me.
As for the second, you are saying that every individual internet user needs to become a trade negotiator? What if the special interests who benefit from high tariffs are in control of the government and don't allow alternate voices to be heard?
More information about the discuss