[discuss] surveillance governance, was Re: [governance] NTIA statement

[Marilyn Cade]

For purposes of discussion, it could make sense to focus on the phrase 'networked governance'  and see if that can work for this discussion track. 



Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 20, 2014, at 3:02 PM, "Milton L Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
> 
> Rare agreement between Alejandro and I. ;-)
> I would use the term “networked governance” rather than “MS”, though
>  
> From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Pisanty
> 
> that is not the way the Internet's successful multistakeholder governance mechanisms have emerged - no need to ask for a higher, central, global authority for permission. In fact, the pieces of it that exist had to be circumvented in order to get the Internet to expand. The top-down authorization echoes the delusion of One World Government and is the major flaw of the MIPOG idea. 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140323/b345382a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss at 1net.org
http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss