[discuss] surveillance governance, was Re: [governance] NTIA statement

Jefsey jefsey at jefsey.com
Thu Mar 20 09:28:33 UTC 2014

At 08:00 20/03/2014, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>Content-Language: en-US
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="_000_baae0399236e434cb18e170a0e2c67f2EX13MBX13adsyredu_"
>Rare agreement between Alejandro and I. ;-)
>I would use the term "networked governance" rather than "MS", though

I created http://intergovernance.org 10 years ago.....
May-be time to activate it? In order to implement the DNSA?

>From: discuss-bounces at 1net.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at 1net.org] On 
>Behalf Of Alejandro Pisanty
>that is not the way the Internet's successful multistakeholder 
>governance mechanisms have emerged - no need to ask for a higher, 
>central, global authority for permission. In fact, the pieces of it 
>that exist had to be circumvented in order to get the Internet to 
>expand. The top-down authorization echoes the delusion of One World 
>Government and is the major flaw of the MIPOG idea.
>discuss mailing list
>discuss at 1net.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140320/32dcd9d2/attachment.html>

More information about the discuss mailing list