[discuss] What is MSism?

Thu Mar 27 09:22:57 UTC 2014

At 21:06 26/03/2014, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>In plain English and without the diplomatic coating, get lost and 
>take your useless nonsense somewhere else.

Dear Jorge,

I presume that what you call a nonsense are VGN/VGNICs. I therefore 
thank you for eventually clearly expressing the IG issue in rude 
terms. I and others will certainly use them to show there are three 
positions at stake and what are their problem: Strikling's, yours and 
mine. Strikling's is brillant, mine is trying to express the 
resulting reality, and yours defends what you always known which is 
passing away and has to pass away in good conditions for all.

I am sure every informed user understands your distress at the change 
and hopes that you will understand as soon as possible the 
opportunity Lawrence Strikling is offering to the US and possibly the 
world with the cooperation of the Brazilian civil society. Nobody 
wants to know if this is a carefully prepared alternative to Dubai or 
an intelligent response to the WCIT vote, the question is to know if 
Lawrence Strikling's bet succeeds and, most of all, how it succeeds 
in assembling the new digital order.

As one of the interlocutors engaged in this debate by historical job 
and engagement, I cannot explain you why your position is sympathetic 
but should not last too long if you do not want to embrass what is 
actually being complexly engaged by your country and by no means 
stabilized. I would however suggest you to join an NTIA think-tank on 
the situation, if this exists, and contribute there. An happy 
conclusion of the current debate can only benefit from aware members 
of the multitude having a strong motivation for their technology and 
their country.

jfc 