[discuss] ITU - Internet related Resolutions

Sivasubramanian M isolatedn at gmail.com
Mon Oct 27 14:30:46 UTC 2014


Thanks Bill and Carlos.  You have explained it so succinctly.

Sivasubramanian M <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>




On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:

> Other fora don't have a 150-year-old secretariat with a declining budget,
> full of bureaucrats desperate to see that budget not hit zero before their
> retirement accounts are fully funded.
>
>
>                 -Bill
>
>
> On Oct 27, 2014, at 22:51, "Carlos Raúl G." <crg at isoc-cr.org> wrote:
>
> I ask myself the same question: how different for Governments is  the ITU
> forum from other Fora where they seems perfectly happy with the bottom up
> MS model?
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> +506 8335 2487
> Enviado desde mi iPhone
>
> El 27/10/2014, a las 7:33, Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn at gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
> I am curious to know why Brazil is on the side of Russia, despite
> embracing the multi-stakeholder model, demonstrated recently by Dilma
> Roussef's support for NetMundial and despite the proven success of nic.br's
> multi-stakeholder model, despite the benevolent influence of Brazilian
> Community Leaders like Harmut Glaser. What caused Brazil to be part of IBSA
> and why is it on the wrong side?
>
>
> Sivasubramanian M <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:
>
>> > On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Adam <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
>> > Is Saudi speaking for a large block of countries?
>>
>> In so far as lines are drawn, here’s what I’ve observed this evening:
>>
>> On one side:
>> The Internets
>> United Kingdom
>> Bulgaria
>> Japan
>> Canada
>> USA
>> Australia
>> Ghana
>> Nigeria
>> New Zealand
>> Grenada
>>
>> On the other side:
>> Saudi Arabia
>> Argentina
>> Brazil
>> Paraguay
>> Oman
>> Russia
>>
>> Wildcard:
>> India
>>
>> Helpful grammar authoritarians, who are striving to make evil documents
>> at least marginally intelligible:
>> Bulgaria
>> Sweden
>>
>> Meeting concluded with an admonishment by the chair to Saudi Arabia to
>> consider limiting its contributions to ones which “reflect present reality.”
>>
>> The Internet-issues ad-hoc reconvenes at 18:00 on Wednesday, unless the
>> secretariat is able to find an earlier time.
>>
>> Fact-checking the idiocy that’s spouted in this room is surprisingly
>> difficult, given 85% packet loss getting out of the building.  One could be
>> cynical about that, but I’ll resist the urge.
>>
>>                                 -Bill
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at 1net.org
>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20141027/cd7151f4/attachment.html>


More information about the discuss mailing list