[discuss] [IANAxfer] [ccnso-igrg] Two accountability questions - help pls- Workshop 23 - ICANN accountability
seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Thu Sep 11 18:23:33 UTC 2014
I read good progress afterall :)
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 11 Sep 2014 19:15, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:09:49AM -0700, Mike Roberts wrote:
> > Before this thread goes any further, someone should ask a lawyer
> > familiar with California statutes to give an opinion on the ICANN
> > Board’s ability to delegate its powers to a third party entity,
> > whether inside the bylaws or not.
> That's actually another thing that I like about John's idea -- it
> isn't actually giving others any positive power, but instead giving
> others the negative power to stop the Board (basically, by
> reconstituting it). I suppose you could argue that vacating a
> decision would be exercising a power, and if that's the case (I have
> no basis on which to claim one way or the other) then perhaps only the
> member-removal option ought to be chosen. The reason I would like to
> have both is because I think it'd be really disruptive to remove Board
> members with any frequency.
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss