[discuss] We have had four years since the Netmundial statement and the online world is getting worse

[Becky Lentz, Dr.]

Perhaps we can find a way to catalog the various accomplishments in this period as a platform for planning next steps in a coordinated way?

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 26, 2018, at 1:34 PM, Nicolas Fiumarelli <nicocamarao at gmail.com<mailto:nicocamarao at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hello everyone. Nicolas Fiumarelli from Youth IGF Uruguay.
Like Ian, I think the fact that 4 years have passed from this activity makes me reflect and think, since then there has been no activity that has a multistakeholder mechanism as strong as it was when the call for comments on the statement happened. If there is any way to rescue that technology, which allowed comments on the paragraphs online. I think it was a very good moment, in fact I can say with certainty that that was the boom of the technology applied to multistakeholder modeling for creating agreements between hundreds of interested parties .. And as Ian said, I do not like the idea of waiting for things to be in resolved nation states acting unilaterally when we already have experience of these digital and dynamic multistakeholder ways of resolving things. My advice is to return to these practices where technology takes a particular role in making decisions or "agreements." I repeat, I have not seen an activity as transparent and open as it was the setting of that statement in NETMundial.

Nico Fiumarelli.

2018-04-25 20:16 GMT-03:00 Nnenna Nwakanma <nnenna75 at gmail.com<mailto:nnenna75 at gmail.com>>:
I am interested in this conversation

Nnenna

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:45 PM, ian.peter at ianpeter.com<mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com> <ian.peter at ianpeter.com<mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com>> wrote:
Just noticed that we have reached 4 years since this statement - and reading it again, it still has a lot of valid things to say.

http://netmundial.br/netmundial-multistakeholder-statement/

Sadly, however, there seems to be no current initiative or any on the horizon capable of addressing the global problems raised then, which are getting worse and taking on new dimensions.

Do we just give up? Or just rely on nation states acting unilaterally to somehow resolve these problems when unilateral action is not sufficient and in some cases it isn't in their perceived interests to take any action whatsoever?



Ian Peter

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss at 1net.org<mailto:discuss at 1net.org>
http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss at 1net.org<mailto:discuss at 1net.org>
http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss at 1net.org<mailto:discuss at 1net.org>
http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20180426/bf602325/attachment.html>