[discuss] We have had four years since the Netmundial statement and the online world is getting worse

Nicolas Fiumarelli nicocamarao at gmail.com
Thu Apr 26 17:33:46 UTC 2018

Hello everyone. Nicolas Fiumarelli from Youth IGF Uruguay.
Like Ian, I think the fact that 4 years have passed from this activity
makes me reflect and think, since then there has been no activity that has
a multistakeholder mechanism as strong as it was when the call for comments
on the statement happened. If there is any way to rescue that technology,
which allowed comments on the paragraphs online. I think it was a very good
moment, in fact I can say with certainty that that was the boom of the
technology applied to multistakeholder modeling for creating agreements
between hundreds of interested parties .. And as Ian said, I do not like
the idea of waiting for things to be in resolved nation states acting
unilaterally when we already have experience of these digital and dynamic
multistakeholder ways of resolving things. My advice is to return to these
practices where technology takes a particular role in making decisions or
"agreements." I repeat, I have not seen an activity as transparent and open
as it was the setting of that statement in NETMundial.

Nico Fiumarelli.

2018-04-25 20:16 GMT-03:00 Nnenna Nwakanma <nnenna75 at gmail.com>:

> I am interested in this conversation
> Nnenna
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:45 PM, ian.peter at ianpeter.com <
> ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
>> Just noticed that we have reached 4 years since this statement - and
>> reading it again, it still has a lot of valid things to say.
>> http://netmundial.br/netmundial-multistakeholder-statement/
>> Sadly, however, there seems to be no current initiative or any on the
>> horizon capable of addressing the global problems raised then, which are
>> getting worse and taking on new dimensions.
>> Do we just give up? Or just rely on nation states acting unilaterally to
>> somehow resolve these problems when unilateral action is not sufficient and
>> in some cases it isn't in their perceived interests to take any action
>> whatsoever?
>> Ian Peter
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at 1net.org
>> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org
> http://1net-mail.1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20180426/946b17f4/attachment.html>

More information about the discuss mailing list