[discuss] cgi.br release regarding Brazil Global MSM on Internet Governance
avri at acm.org
Sat Jan 11 20:22:41 UTC 2014
It seems to me that the steering committee should receive candidate
lists from those who wish to send them candidate lists. They then have
the responsibility for doing due diligence to make sure the appropriate
diversity and inclusion requirements are met.
If any stakeholder group is united, then there won't be competing
candidate lists other than perhaps from outlier groups. And those
difficult decisions are the reason all stakeholders, hopefully, picked
their best of the /1net steering committee.
On 11-Jan-14 15:02, Roland Perry wrote:
> In message <13e8ae07-0b60-4be0-80b6-ab81a3ef23e6 at email.android.com>, at
> 20:23:21 on Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Nick Ashton-Hart <nashton at ccianet.org> writes
>> My understanding of the process, Roland, is that BASIS picked their
>> nominees to both 1net and the Brazil meeting and presented both lists
>> in early January
> That's what I suspected (although use of the past tense before Xmas
> makes me wonder if the lists were ready then), but [to address the other
> issue] do we know if 1net is willing to process nominations from other
> business organisations as well?
More information about the discuss