[discuss] Will there be life on 1net after IANA is globalized? (:-)

[Naresh Ajwani]

McTim,

.."Can you elaborate on your experience, especially on which issues are
"sensitive"?

Here my submission is that it wud be apt to refer to contributions/papers
posted at NETmundial website, especially the ones advocating
multilateralism and the ones saying need for all inclusive stakeholderism.
These papers are covering sensitivities too besides reasonings.

"... In addition, to echo what Dr. Pisanty says downthread, there is a
great deal of outreach going on.  I recall that in the AFRINIC region, they
have built a new WG to engage government folks and to help bring them into
the PDP.  The RIPE region also has a similar outreach program for
governments specifically."

First of all, my submissions are in my personal capacity and  discussions
are not on trivial issues like engagements. When I am referring to outreach
programs,  it is for expanding stakholderism or costituencies with rights.

Regards & best wishes

Naresh Ajwani
On 13 Mar 2014 16:16, "McTim" <mctimconsulting at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Naresh,
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Naresh Ajwani <ajwaninaresh at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Thanks Greg for the elaborative response. Frankly, it has raised yet more
>> queries, may be because of my firm belief in all inclusiveness and no
>> spiritless processes.
>>
>> "..... In  a sense, the best protection for a potential "minority view"
>> is not to end up as a minority view, but rather to end up influencing the
>> consensus so that it resembles that view to the extent possible, with the
>> result that the consensus is thus acceptable to the group holding what
>> might otherwise have been a minority view....."
>>
>> To the best of my experience, especially  in case of sensitive issues,
>> such spirit is lacking. Be that as it may, you would appreciate that  even
>> in your explained ideal environment, the processes are at the most blending
>> minorty views but not protecting them and that itself, in my view  is
>> against multistakeholderism.  It is a known fact that every stakeholder
>> isn't entitled to same equity and justifiably because internet commenced
>> from one corner of the world.
>>
>
>
> Can you elaborate on your experience, especially on which issues are
> "sensitive"?
>
> My experience is the opposite of yours.  I have always found the Technical
> Community processes to be very accommodating of minority views.   As a
> former WG Chair in the RIR system I actually have experience finding
> consensus among a disparate community of policy volunteers.
> In addition, to echo what Dr. Pisanty says downthread, there is a great
> deal of outreach going on.  I recall that in the AFRINIC region, they have
> built a new WG to engage government folks and to help bring them into the
> PDP.  The RIPE region also has a similar outreach program for governments
> specifically.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> McTim
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://1net-mail.1net.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140314/5b2a8402/attachment.html>