[discuss] List membership management
joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Tue May 6 12:00:59 UTC 2014
My last word on this thread.
The problem appears to really be that there is no list organizer willing
or able to make a clarifying and transparent set of rules. 1 Net will,
or maybe already has, become a footnote of something that could have
been, but never was because we are continually sidetracked by pointless
On 5/6/2014 2:22 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> I think that question goes either way; what has using multiple emails
> by one person produced so far? Except that I have perhaps referring to
> a non existing name. - you know those feelings that comes when you
> call someone by name and then you suddenly realised that wasn't it's
> name afterall.
> For me I am not against using multiple email, but I am against using
> multiple identities by one person.
> sent from Google nexus 4
> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> On 6 May 2014 02:50, "Michel Gauthier" <mg at telepresse.com
> <mailto:mg at telepresse.com>> wrote:
> At 22:12 05/05/2014, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Indeed. And one-person one-name seems to be a vital rule to
> avoid falsifying the debate.
> Dont you think that confusing /2NET with a debate is precisely
> what falsifies the MS process? Could you please indicate who is
> then the ICANN, ISOC, IAB, IETF, W3C, ITU, IEEE, RIR one person
> who shoualong you participate to the MS process concerning the
> IANA transition?
> My understanding of this list now is that there are people who
> want to work and build a real project with its real stakeholders
> and those who only want to chat with other chatters.
> Question is: what has the one-person one-mail-name module produced
> so far irt. the internet use satisfaction? I am just asking. I try
> to figure out what MSism is and what non
> M G
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at 1net.org <mailto:discuss at 1net.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss